I’ve always been really bad at trying to do my own eyebrows. I think i’d rather get a professional to do it.
And, I’d always heard that for dark hair like mine, laser was better than electrolysis, and much less unpleasant. i should probably do more homework on the matter huh.
Agh I love thunderstorms. It’s been so long since I’ve seen a good one.
Neil Gaiman to the University of the Arts Class of 2012
… or a meditation on the limits of creativity, which are, of course, nonexistent.
People who know the rules know what is possible and what is impossible. You do not and you should not. The rules of what is possible and impossible were made by people who have not tested the bounds of possible by going beyond them - and you can.
(via Brain Pickings and Coudal Partners)
(Source: vimeo.com)
(Source: therealvagabondking)
(Source: punkmermaid)
The Angels of the Planet Mercury, by Gustave Dore
(Source: the-unknown-friend)
the thing about radfems is that they’re angry women telling other angry women that if they’re angry it means they’re not women
This weekend, the New York Times published an extremely exploitative article about a transgender woman who had died in a fire. The article, about Lorena Escalera, only mentions that she was killed in a fire after telling readers that she was “curvaceous,” that she “drew admiring glances” in her “gritty Brooklyn neighborhood,” that she “was known to invite men for visits to her apartment,” that Lorena was “called Lorena” (as opposed to saying she was “named Lorena” or that she simply was Lorena) and that she “brought two men to her apartment” sometime between late Friday night and early Saturday morning.
The article by Al Baker and Nate Schweber treats Escalera completely disrespectfully, later describing a pile of debris outside the burned apartment which “contained many colorful items. Among them were wigs, women’s shoes, coins from around the world, makeup, hair spray, handbags, a shopping bag from Spandex House, a red feather boa and a pamphlet on how to quit smoking.”
Take the word “transgender” out of the equation.
Would the New York Times ever describe a woman who is not transgender, who had died in a fire, as “curvaceous” - in the first sentence, no less? Would it carefully note that her apartment contained makeup and “women’s shoes?” Would it say that she was “called” whatever her name was - especially if police later identified her by that name?
Janet Mock and other noted leaders in the trans advocacy movement have been speaking out about this article online. Thank you to all of you who submitted incident reports about this article, or alerted us to it through Twitter. We are reaching out to the Times to discuss the many incident reports we received, and to ensure that exploitative pieces like this don’t get printed in the future.
(Source: transfeminism)
8-Inch Dark Chocolate Cocks Filled With… @ United Indecent Pleasures
welp
“I don’t reblog nsfw things” -catgoboom
Iiiiiiiii want that please and thank you
am i the only one who see this as Benedict Cumberbatch?
(Source: cpnblowfish)
suggested by
hey Larry Sanders, y’know, you’re a pretty good show, but you really need to work on that whole, trans thing. Outing a dude’s girl, even when done by harvey fierstein, as trans, and having it be obviously OOF HORRIBLE, really dates your show. Okay, so, it was holy fuck like sixteen years ago, but still. I can be bothered.
Shameless (the british series) could also be on-call but it’s also a little dated plus I can’t really comment on british culture, I dunno if it was ahead or behind the curve on that side of the pond.